T-Mobile and the City of Tustin planned to erect a 65 foot cell phone tower at the back end of the park near the gate to Peters Canyon Elementary school. The proposal received approval from the Tustin Zoning Commission despite vigorous opposition at the public meeting on Wednesday, October 20th. Due in large part to additional opposition raised by local residents in the days following this meeting, and at the request of Tustin City Council Member Doug Davert, the Zoning Commission decision was vacated on October 27th, and a public hearing before the Planning Commission was set for December 14, 2010, to allow for additional public input.
T-Mobile has redesigned the proposed installation to look like 3, 45' tall flag poles located in the parking area of the park. While this is a better design, it will only accommodate their equipment and, if another carrier wants to place an installation in the park additional towers must be built.
Let them know you are not happy about this!
If you would like to get involved or join our email list please email us at SaveCedarGrovePark@gmail.com.
We are not opposed to the use of cell phones and wireless technology, and acknowledge that cell phone coverage in the Peters Canyon area of Tustin Ranch is sub-standard. However, we feel that Cedar Grove Park is no place for a cell tower due to its historic significance, scenic beauty, and close proximity to Peters Canyon Elementary and Pioneer Middle Schools. We also feel that a tower at this location will have a negative impact on property values of homes nearby. Once it is done, it cannot be undone.
Our goal is to convince the Planning Commission, Tustin City Council, and T-Mobile to consider alternate sites for a cell tower to serve the needs of the Peters Canyon area that will have less negative impact on the neighboring communities.
Many cities around Southern California are in battles with their city officials and T-Mobile, or other cell service providers, due to the proliferation of cell towers in residential neighborhoods. Often the first notice residents have of a tower going up is when the construction crews arrive to start breaking ground. We advocate greater transparency in the selection process of these sites and inclusion of the local residents in the final approval to assure that the best possible site is selected and the negative impacts to the community are minimized.
An alternate location for a cell installation exists just 400 yards from Cedar Grove Park at the Orange County Fire Authority complex on Jamboree Road. Two cell towers have been approved for construction there and Verizon, AT&T, and Sprint have already agreed to place their equipment at this facility. We feel T-Mobile should do the same.
Monday, November 22, 2010
Have a look at our sample letter if you would like some ideas on what type of information to mention.
City Council: email@example.com;
David Biggs, City Manager: firstname.lastname@example.org;
Elizabeth Binsack, Director of Community Development & Zoning Administrator: email@example.com;
Ryan Swiontek, city planning: firstname.lastname@example.org;
And why stop with the Tustin city officials? Let T-Mobile hear from you as well:
Robert Dotson, President of T-Mobile: email@example.com
Saturday, November 13, 2010
We are interested in hearing your opinion. Do you consider this tower to be a good alternate location for the proposed Cedar Grove tower, or would you rather not have a tower installed in either location?
Please take the poll on the left side of the page.
The OC Fire Authority is within the city limits of Irvine and is therefore subject to their regulations regarding zoning on this matter.
Thursday, November 4, 2010
The whole fight got started when T-Mobile received approval from the city council in 2007 to begin construction of the two cell towers in the parks. Local residents were not aware of the decision until construction was already underway. A public outcry ensued and residents began looking for ways to stop the construction. The answer was discovered in Measure C, a 1990 city ballot measure requiring voter approval on any construction project that cost over $100,000 in a city park or beach. Based on this measure, the city council reversed itself and canceled the construction project.
Well it didn't stop there. T-Mobile sued Huntington Beach in Federal court and the judge ruled that the 1996 Federal Telecommunications Act overruled Measure C. The city would have to find another way to prevent the towers. Thus Measure Q was drafted and submitted for voter approval.
The whole matter is headed back to Federal court on November 9. Hopefully, the Federal judge, armed with the knowledge that the citizens of Huntington Beach do not want cell towers in their city parks, will side with the will of the people.
Monday, November 1, 2010
Enhanced 911 services in the cellular industry have been implemented in two phases. Phase I Enhanced 911 (E911) requires wireless service providers to provide the PSAP with the telephone number of the originator of a wireless 911 call and the location of the cell site or base station transmitting the call within six minutes of a valid request. Phase II E911 requires the provider to give the latitude and longitude of the caller to the PSAP with in six minutes of a valid request by a PSAP. This information must be accurate to within 50 to 300 meters depending on the type of technology used.
The FCC required wireless carriers to have Phase II E911 for 95% of their subscribers by the end of 2005, however, because of the complexity of the coordination and technology required from wireless carriers, it is still important to stay on the line and provide the dispatcher with as much information about the exact location of the emergency to ensure help can be dispatched to the correct location.
For more information, access the FCC website here: