It's interesting to note that they chose to erect the tower in the parking lot, not up at the end of the park where the tower installation is actually going to be. Is it because if they tested up there they would actually get a poorer reading? And what conclusions can be drawn from a test that doesn't actually simulate the real location?They have been telling us over and over that changing the height or the location of the antenna by as little as a few feet can have a drastic impact on the coverage for a given location. Currently T-Mobile claims that the OCFA site is inferior to the Cedar Grove site because their antennas at OCFA would be five feet lower than at Cedar Grove Park. Five feet! So what are we to believe?
Don't forget - the Planning Commission Hearing is next Tuesday, January 25th!